SAMEER KHAN AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/8924/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010480112026

e-Filing Number

19-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/16729/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/8924/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Category

63.12 - MISC. PUNJAB ( 738 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMEER KHAN AND ANOTHER

    Adv. MANDEEP KUMAR DHOT

  2. 2.State of Punjab and others

  3. 3.Deputy commissioner

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Punjab and others

  3. 3.Deputy commissioner

  4. 4.Sub Divisional Magistrate cum Marriage Officer

  5. 5.Tehsildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/8924/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition filed by Sameer Khan and another seeking directions to the State of Punjab to consider their marriage registration application under the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The court accepted the State's undertaking that the Competent Authority would address the petitioners' grievance within four weeks while adhering to relevant judicial precedents, with both parties consenting to this arrangement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8924/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/8924/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition filed by Sameer Khan and another seeking directions to the State of Punjab to consider their marriage registration application under the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The court accepted the State's undertaking that the Competent Authority would address the petitioners' grievance within four weeks while adhering to relevant judicial precedents, with both parties consenting to this arrangement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case