AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/8879/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 and 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2025

CNR: PHHC010479742026

e-Filing Number

19-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/16720/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/8879/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Bench Type

Double

Category

31.11 - FINANCIAL CORPORATION UOI D.B. ( 558 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 and 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD

    Adv. VAIBHAV MITTAL

  2. 2.State of Punjab and Others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Punjab and Others

  3. 3.Duty Magistrate cum tehsildar

  4. 4.Senior superintendent of police

  5. 5.Station House office police Station

  6. 6.Sawinder Singh

  7. 7.Paramjeet Kaur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas Suri,mr. Justice Suvir SehgalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted AU Small Finance Bank's writ petition, directing the competent authority to re-deliver possession of a secured asset to the bank within 15 days, after private respondents forcibly took back possession on 30.01.2026 despite the Chief Judicial Magistrate's earlier order under the SARFAESI Act. The court also granted liberty to the State to pursue criminal action against the private respondents for violation of the possession order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8879/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted AU Small Finance Bank's writ petition, directing the competent authority to re-deliver possession of a secured asset to the bank within 15 days, after private respondents forcibly took back possession on 30.01.2026 despite the Chief Judicial Magistrate's earlier order under the SARFAESI Act. The court also granted liberty to the State to pursue criminal action against the private respondents for violation of the possession order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case