CHIRAG SHARMA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CRM-M/16671/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010479632026

Filing Number

CRM-M/20674/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/16671/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Coram

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Category

38.21 - QUASHING PETITION COMPROMISE U/S 482 CRPC GEN ( 641 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHIRAG SHARMA AND ANOTHER

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR

  2. 2.CHIRAG SHARMA

  3. 3.ANURAG MAAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.ANURAG MAAN

  3. 3.DEVENDER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Mandeep PannuView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/16671/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No.183 (dated 11.05.2025) against petitioners Chirag Sharma and another, filed under Sections 351(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959, based on a genuine compromise dated 26.02.2026 between the parties. The court found the dispute personal in nature without heinous offences, the compromise voluntary and without coercion, and concluded that continuing proceedings would serve no useful purpose and constitute abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/16671/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/16671/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed FIR No.183 (dated 11.05.2025) against petitioners Chirag Sharma and another, filed under Sections 351(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959, based on a genuine compromise dated 26.02.2026 between the parties. The court found the dispute personal in nature without heinous offences, the compromise voluntary and without coercion, and concluded that continuing proceedings would serve no useful purpose and constitute abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case