MOHAMMAD JAMEEL vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/8903/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2025

CNR: PHHC010479042026

e-Filing Number

19-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/16682/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/8903/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Category

31.2 - MUNICIPAL & PANCHAYAT LAWS ( 559 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMAD JAMEEL

    Adv. IMRAN FAROOQI

  2. 2.State of Punjab and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Punjab and others

  3. 3.Director

  4. 4.Municipal Council, Malerkotla

  5. 5.Mohd Rashid

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP-8903-2026 Mohammad Jameel petitioned the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct authorities to take action against illegal/unauthorized construction by Mohd. Rashid. The Municipal Corporation, Malerkotla informed the court that notices under Sections 195 and 195-A of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 had already been issued and a suit had been filed against the respondent. The court disposed of the petition as no further orders were necessary, given that appropriate legal action was already underway. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8903/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP-8903-2026 Mohammad Jameel petitioned the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct authorities to take action against illegal/unauthorized construction by Mohd. Rashid. The Municipal Corporation, Malerkotla informed the court that notices under Sections 195 and 195-A of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 had already been issued and a suit had been filed against the respondent. The court disposed of the petition as no further orders were necessary, given that appropriate legal action was already underway. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case