SANJEEV KUMAR VIJ vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/8890/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2025

CNR: PHHC010478552026

e-Filing Number

19-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/16636/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/8890/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Category

68.7 - SERVICE-EDU-PUNJAB(SECONDARY)(TGT) ( 796 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJEEV KUMAR VIJ

    Adv. KRISHAN SINGH DADWAL

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  3. 3.DIRECTOR

  4. 4.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER

  5. 5.PRINCIPAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Sanjeev Kumar Vij's petition challenging a relieving report that assigned him additional clerical duties at one office while maintaining duties at a school. The court, without deciding the merits, directed the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's pending representation within two months, in light of precedent set by the Suman Sehdev case, by issuing a reasoned order after hearing the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8890/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Sanjeev Kumar Vij's petition challenging a relieving report that assigned him additional clerical duties at one office while maintaining duties at a school. The court, without deciding the merits, directed the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's pending representation within two months, in light of precedent set by the Suman Sehdev case, by issuing a reasoned order after hearing the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case