KULWANT KAUR SANDHU vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR — CRM-M/16004/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
CNR: PHHC010477702026
Filing Number
CRM-M/20603/2026
Filing Date
19-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/16004/2026
Registration Date
20-Mar-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh
Coram
Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh
Bench Type
Single
Category
38.29 - QUASHING PET U/S 482 CRPC GEN IN U/S 138 NI ACT ( 649 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KULWANT KAUR SANDHU
Adv. JYOTI SAREEN
-
2.KULWANT KAUR SANDHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR
-
2.KULWANT KAUR SANDHU
-
3.CAPITAL SMALL FINANCE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF
Summary of CRM-M/16004/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed the trial court's order declaring Kulwant Kaur Sandhu a proclaimed person in a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 case, finding the procedure defective. The court held that the trial court violated mandatory procedural requirements under Section 82(2) of CrPC by declaring her proclaimed on July 29, 2025, based on a proclamation issued for May 22, 2025, without issuing a fresh proclamation after the 30-day statutory period expired and subsequent court dates passed without declaration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/16004/2026
Summary of CRM-M/16004/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana quashed the trial court's order declaring Kulwant Kaur Sandhu a proclaimed person in a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 case, finding the procedure defective. The court held that the trial court violated mandatory procedural requirements under Section 82(2) of CrPC by declaring her proclaimed on July 29, 2025, based on a proclamation issued for May 22, 2025, without issuing a fresh proclamation after the 30-day statutory period expired and subsequent court dates passed without declaration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts