JAGDISH SINGH vs SATNAM SINGH — CRM-M/26966/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010477502026

Filing Number

CRM-M/20582/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/26966/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Category

38.29 - QUASHING PET U/S 482 CRPC GEN IN U/S 138 NI ACT ( 649 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGDISH SINGH

    Adv. MANDEEP KUMAR DHOT

  2. 2.JAGDISH SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATNAM SINGH

  2. 2.JAGDISH SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-26966-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana modified an appellate order requiring Jagdish Singh to deposit 20% of awarded compensation as a condition for sentence suspension, finding this amount incompliable with his financial capacity. The court reduced the deposit requirement to 10% payable within three weeks, while directing the petitioner to proceed with his pending appeal without unnecessary adjournments or dilatory tactics. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/26966/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-26966-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana modified an appellate order requiring Jagdish Singh to deposit 20% of awarded compensation as a condition for sentence suspension, finding this amount incompliable with his financial capacity. The court reduced the deposit requirement to 10% payable within three weeks, while directing the petitioner to proceed with his pending appeal without unnecessary adjournments or dilatory tactics. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case