MANVIR SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/15874/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010477332026

Filing Number

CRM-M/20499/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/15874/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANVIR SINGH

    Adv. HAKAM SINGH

  2. 2.MANVIR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.MANVIR SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed Manvir Singh's bail petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Singh was arrested with a hand grenade and IED recovered from his scooter based on intelligence regarding arms smuggling by Babbar Khalsa International operatives. The court rejected his argument that he deserved bail like co-accused Karamjit Singh, distinguishing that Singh possessed actual explosive devices while Karamjit Singh had none, and found the gravity of the offense and reasonable trial pace did not warrant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/15874/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed Manvir Singh's bail petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Singh was arrested with a hand grenade and IED recovered from his scooter based on intelligence regarding arms smuggling by Babbar Khalsa International operatives. The court rejected his argument that he deserved bail like co-accused Karamjit Singh, distinguishing that Singh possessed actual explosive devices while Karamjit Singh had none, and found the gravity of the offense and reasonable trial pace did not warrant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case