RAI BHADUR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/8915/2026

Case under The Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2025

CNR: PHHC010474702026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/16540/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/8915/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Alka Sarin , Justice (To Be Nominated)

Coram

Mrs. Justice Alka Sarin , Justice (To Be Nominated)

Category

18.12 - LAND LAWS D.B. ( 449 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAI BHADUR

    Adv. JASWINDER SINGH GREWAL

  2. 2.State of Punjab And Others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Punjab And Others

  3. 3.Director Panchyat

  4. 4.Deputy Commissioner Fazilka

  5. 5.District Development And Panchyat Officer Fazilka

  6. 6.Block Development And Panchyat Officer Block

  7. 7.Gram Panchyat Village Kaler Khera

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mrs. Justice Alka Sarin,justice (To Be Nominated)View PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No. 3 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 02.02.2026 within six weeks, after providing a hearing opportunity to all concerned parties in accordance with law. The court granted limited relief based on the petitioner's specific prayer for adjudication of the pending representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8915/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No. 3 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 02.02.2026 within six weeks, after providing a hearing opportunity to all concerned parties in accordance with law. The court granted limited relief based on the petitioner's specific prayer for adjudication of the pending representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case