GURDEV CHAND AMANDEEP KAUR vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CWP-PIL/67/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010474462026

e-Filing Number

18-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP-PIL/16519/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP-PIL/67/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry

Coram

The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Sanjiv Berry

Bench Type

Double

Category

13.4 - PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION ( 414 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Technology Development Board Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURDEV CHAND AMANDEEP KAUR

  2. 2.Gurdev Chand

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.Gurdev Chand

  3. 3.The Director

  4. 4.Joint Director

  5. 5.Deputy Superintendent of Police

  6. 6.Additional Deputy Commissioner

  7. 7.Executive Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    The Chief Justice,mr. Justice Sanjiv BerryView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP-PIL-67-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Gurdev Chand's PIL challenging inquiry reports by the Vigilance Bureau and Urban Development authorities. The court held that while police must register FIRs when complaints allege cognizable offences and investigations disclose commission of such offences, the PIL was superfluous since the petitioner has a more appropriate remedy under Section 175(3) BNSS, 2023 to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate directly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP-PIL/67/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP-PIL-67-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of Gurdev Chand's PIL challenging inquiry reports by the Vigilance Bureau and Urban Development authorities. The court held that while police must register FIRs when complaints allege cognizable offences and investigations disclose commission of such offences, the PIL was superfluous since the petitioner has a more appropriate remedy under Section 175(3) BNSS, 2023 to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate directly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case