CHANDER AND OTHERS vs SUDHIR RAJPAL , IAS AND OTHERS — COCP/1265/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010473132026

Filing Number

COCP/16450/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

COCP/1265/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Coram

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDER AND OTHERS

    Adv. CHANDER PAL TIWANA

  2. 2.SUDHIR RAJPAL IAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUDHIR RAJPAL , IAS AND OTHERS

  2. 2.SUDHIR RAJPAL IAS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: COCP/1265/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana discharged a contempt petition filed by Chander and others against Sudhir Rajpal, IAS, finding that the respondents had complied with the Court's March 20, 2024 order directing them to consider and decide the petitioners' claim. The Divisional Forest Officer, Jind rejected the petitioners' claim by order dated March 31, 2025. The Court held the contempt purged and discharged, while preserving the petitioners' right to challenge the rejection order through available legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COCP/1265/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COCP/1265/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana discharged a contempt petition filed by Chander and others against Sudhir Rajpal, IAS, finding that the respondents had complied with the Court's March 20, 2024 order directing them to consider and decide the petitioners' claim. The Divisional Forest Officer, Jind rejected the petitioners' claim by order dated March 31, 2025. The Court held the contempt purged and discharged, while preserving the petitioners' right to challenge the rejection order through available legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case