SUBE SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CRM-M/16102/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010472182026

Filing Number

CRM-M/20306/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/16102/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Coram

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Category

47 - CRIMINAL MISC.(DIRECTION) ( 215 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBE SINGH

    Adv. ANSHUL MUWAL

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Ms. Justice Mandeep PannuView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/16102/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of Sube Singh's petition seeking action against an accused for publicly insulting him using casteist remarks. Justice Mandeep Pannu directed the State of Haryana (Respondent No. 2) to expeditiously decide Singh's representation filed on 04.11.2025 in accordance with law and to provide immediate protection if any threat to his life and liberty is perceived, while clarifying the order does not grant immunity to the petitioner for any violations of law committed by him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/16102/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/16102/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of Sube Singh's petition seeking action against an accused for publicly insulting him using casteist remarks. Justice Mandeep Pannu directed the State of Haryana (Respondent No. 2) to expeditiously decide Singh's representation filed on 04.11.2025 in accordance with law and to provide immediate protection if any threat to his life and liberty is perceived, while clarifying the order does not grant immunity to the petitioner for any violations of law committed by him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case