JASBIR KAUR vs GURJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER — FAO/2459/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 173. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010471402025

Filing Number

FAO/18247/2025

Filing Date

21-Mar-2025

Registration No

FAO/2459/2025

Registration Date

23-Apr-2025

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Category

500.31 - APPL FILED BY CLAIMANT FOR ENHANCE IN GEN CASES ( 896 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JASBIR KAUR

    Adv. RAJBIR SINGH

  2. 2.JASBIR KAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GURJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.JASBIR KAUR

  3. 3.CEIGALL INDIA LTD

  4. 4.ORIENTAL INSU CO LTD

  5. 5.HARPREET KAUR

  6. 6.AMREEN KAUR

  7. 7.INDER SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Summary of FAO/2459/2025 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Jasbir Kaur's appeal seeking enhancement of Rs.31 lakh motor accident compensation awarded for her son's death. The court rejected the appeal on both procedural and substantive grounds: the 310-day delay in filing was not condoned as ignorance of law provides no excuse, and on merits, the tribunal's assessment of the deceased's monthly income at Rs.15,000 was upheld because claimants failed to produce supporting evidence (tax returns or clinic documentation) despite pleading he was a BAMS doctor earning Rs.2 lakh monthly and agriculturist earning Rs.1.4 lakh monthly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/2459/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of FAO/2459/2025 The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Jasbir Kaur's appeal seeking enhancement of Rs.31 lakh motor accident compensation awarded for her son's death. The court rejected the appeal on both procedural and substantive grounds: the 310-day delay in filing was not condoned as ignorance of law provides no excuse, and on merits, the tribunal's assessment of the deceased's monthly income at Rs.15,000 was upheld because claimants failed to produce supporting evidence (tax returns or clinic documentation) despite pleading he was a BAMS doctor earning Rs.2 lakh monthly and agriculturist earning Rs.1.4 lakh monthly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case