JASPREET SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/8862/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Mar-2025

CNR: PHHC010467392026

e-Filing Number

17-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/16230/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/8862/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Category

63.63 - CASES RELATING TO ALL KINDS OF COMPENSATION ( 756 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JASPREET SINGH

    Adv. DHEERJA

  2. 2.State of Punjab and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Punjab and others

  3. 3.District Legal Services Authority

  4. 4.Victim Compensation Committee

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Jaspreet Singh's petition challenging a Rs.25,000 compensation award for 50% permanent disability from a 2017 accident, finding the petition barred by inordinate delay and laches. Singh filed the challenge approximately 9 years after the Victim Compensation Committee's September 2017 award, with no adequate explanation for the delay, and the court declined to exercise its extraordinary writ jurisdiction given the unreasonable time lapse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8862/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Jaspreet Singh's petition challenging a Rs.25,000 compensation award for 50% permanent disability from a 2017 accident, finding the petition barred by inordinate delay and laches. Singh filed the challenge approximately 9 years after the Victim Compensation Committee's September 2017 award, with no adequate explanation for the delay, and the court declined to exercise its extraordinary writ jurisdiction given the unreasonable time lapse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case