SUKHWINDER SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRM-M/15881/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010463962026

Filing Number

CRM-M/19911/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/15881/2026

Registration Date

20-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Category

47 - CRIMINAL MISC.(DIRECTION) ( 215 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUKHWINDER SINGH

    Adv. ANMOL THAKUR

  2. 2.SUKHWINDER SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.SUKHWINDER SINGH

  3. 3.SSP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-15881/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition filed by Sukhwinder Singh seeking transfer of investigation of FIR No.27 (dated 15.02.2026) registered at P.S. Sadar, Gurdaspur, for offenses under BNS Sections 115(2), 117(2), 324(4), 126(2), 351(2), and 3(5). The court directed the respondent No.2 (SSP) to decide the petitioner's representation within 15 days by passing a reasoned order, while clarifying that no merits-based finding was being returned and the respondent retained independent discretion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/15881/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-15881/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the petition filed by Sukhwinder Singh seeking transfer of investigation of FIR No.27 (dated 15.02.2026) registered at P.S. Sadar, Gurdaspur, for offenses under BNS Sections 115(2), 117(2), 324(4), 126(2), 351(2), and 3(5). The court directed the respondent No.2 (SSP) to decide the petitioner's representation within 15 days by passing a reasoned order, while clarifying that no merits-based finding was being returned and the respondent retained independent discretion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case