VISHANT ALIAS VISHU vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/15480/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010461292026

Filing Number

CRM-M/19826/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/15480/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHANT ALIAS VISHU

    Adv. ROHIT MITTAL

  2. 2.VISHANT @ VISHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.VISHANT @ VISHU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/15480/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Vishant Alias Vishu, accused of illegal firearms possession under BNS sections 111(3), 111(4) and Arms Act sections 25(1)(a) & 25(6). The court held that after 5+ months in custody with investigation complete, challan presented, and charges framed with trial yet to commence, continued detention violated Article 21 rights and contravened the principle that "bail is a rule, jail is an exception." The petitioner's first-offender status and no prospect of near-term trial conclusion supported release on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/15480/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/15480/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Vishant Alias Vishu, accused of illegal firearms possession under BNS sections 111(3), 111(4) and Arms Act sections 25(1)(a) & 25(6). The court held that after 5+ months in custody with investigation complete, challan presented, and charges framed with trial yet to commence, continued detention violated Article 21 rights and contravened the principle that "bail is a rule, jail is an exception." The petitioner's first-offender status and no prospect of near-term trial conclusion supported release on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case