RANJIT SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/15162/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010460892026
Filing Number
CRM-M/19845/2026
Filing Date
17-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/15162/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh
Coram
Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RANJIT SINGH
Adv. VIVEK K. THAKUR
-
2.RANJIT SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB
-
2.RANJIT SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF
Case Summary: CRM-M-15162-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Ranjit Singh in a gold chain snatching case. The court found that the sole evidence against him—a co-accused's disclosure statement—is inadmissible under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act as no incriminating material was recovered following the statement, and no identification parade was conducted. Given his five-month custody, completed investigation, and absence of evidence tampering risk, the court held bail is warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/15162/2026
Case Summary: CRM-M-15162-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted bail to Ranjit Singh in a gold chain snatching case. The court found that the sole evidence against him—a co-accused's disclosure statement—is inadmissible under Section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act as no incriminating material was recovered following the statement, and no identification parade was conducted. Given his five-month custody, completed investigation, and absence of evidence tampering risk, the court held bail is warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts