BISHAN DAI ETC. B.R.MAHAJAN. vs LAJWANTI ETC. — RSA/326/1998

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC010457851998

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

RSA/326/1998

Filing Date

05-05-5500

Registration No

RSA/326/1998

Registration Date

05-05-5500

Judge

MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Coram

MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Bench Type

Single

Category

26 - RSA ( 496 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

13th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

BISHAN DAI ETC. B.R.MAHAJAN.

Respondent(s)

LAJWANTI ETC.

Orders

13-05-2026
MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL

Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the appellants' appeal, reversing the lower appellate court's decision. The court found that Mool Chand (the appellants' predecessor) had been validly allotted evacuee property with a registered conveyance deed dated 1978, and a Settlement Commissioner's inspection in July 1979 confirmed his possession—making the appellants' 1983 suit for possession timely and within the limitation period. The court decreed the suit entirely in favor of the appellants, granting them full ownership and possession of all portions of the property, including portion 'C' which the trial court had denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the appellants' appeal, reversing the lower appellate court's decision. The court found that Mool Chand (the appellants' predecessor) had been validly allotted evacuee property with a registered conveyance deed dated 1978, and a Settlement Commissioner's inspection in July 1979 confirmed his possession—making the appellants' 1983 suit for possession timely and within the limitation period. The court decreed the suit entirely in favor of the appellants, granting them full ownership and possession of all portions of the property, including portion 'C' which the trial court had denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case