SUKHPAL SINGH @ SUKHRAJ SINGH @ SUKHA vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/14960/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010456862026

Filing Number

CRM-M/19587/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/14960/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUKHPAL SINGH @ SUKHRAJ SINGH @ SUKHA

    Adv. LAGHUINDER SINGH SEKHON

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M/14960/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Sukhpal Singh in an NDPS drug trafficking case. Singh was arrested in December 2025 and accused under Sections 21-C, 25, and 29 of the NDPS Act based solely on disclosure statements from co-accused, with heroin recovered from them but not from Singh. Justice Sumeet Goel found that Singh's implication rested entirely on unsubstantiated co-accused statements lacking corroborative evidence, that no challan had been filed despite 4+ months detention, and that Section 37 NDPS rigors were diluted given prolonged pre-trial custody. The court ordered his release on bail with conditions including monthly affidavits confirming non-involvement in further offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/14960/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M/14960/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Sukhpal Singh in an NDPS drug trafficking case. Singh was arrested in December 2025 and accused under Sections 21-C, 25, and 29 of the NDPS Act based solely on disclosure statements from co-accused, with heroin recovered from them but not from Singh. Justice Sumeet Goel found that Singh's implication rested entirely on unsubstantiated co-accused statements lacking corroborative evidence, that no challan had been filed despite 4+ months detention, and that Section 37 NDPS rigors were diluted given prolonged pre-trial custody. The court ordered his release on bail with conditions including monthly affidavits confirming non-involvement in further offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case