KANWALJIT SINGH ALIAS GOLDY vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/16088/2025

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010456292025

Filing Number

CRM-M/23975/2025

Filing Date

20-Mar-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/16088/2025

Registration Date

21-Mar-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Coram

Mr. Justice Aman Chaudhary

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANWALJIT SINGH ALIAS GOLDY

    Adv. GOBIND SINGH RANDHAWA

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Aman ChaudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/16088/2025 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Kanwaljit Singh alias Goldy, accused in FIR No. 293 (dated 06.09.2022) under IPC Sections 302 and 34 for alleged murder. The petitioner had been in custody for 3 years, 6 months, and 9 days; was added to the supplementary statement 4 days after FIR registration with no specific attribution; and his co-accused had already been granted bail. The court found that with only 2 of 24 prosecution witnesses examined and 22 remaining, prolonged incarceration violated Article 21 rights. Bail was granted subject to standard conditions including court appearance, no witness intimidation, and no evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/16088/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/16088/2025 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Kanwaljit Singh alias Goldy, accused in FIR No. 293 (dated 06.09.2022) under IPC Sections 302 and 34 for alleged murder. The petitioner had been in custody for 3 years, 6 months, and 9 days; was added to the supplementary statement 4 days after FIR registration with no specific attribution; and his co-accused had already been granted bail. The court found that with only 2 of 24 prosecution witnesses examined and 22 remaining, prolonged incarceration violated Article 21 rights. Bail was granted subject to standard conditions including court appearance, no witness intimidation, and no evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case