MANMOHAN KAUR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/8254/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.
CNR: PHHC010455412026
e-Filing Number
15-03-2026
Filing Number
CWP/15706/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
CWP/8254/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari
Coram
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari
Bench Type
Single
Category
63.72 - MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS/SENIOR CITIZENS ( 764 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANMOHAN KAUR
Adv. PARUNJEET SINGH
-
2.MANMOHAN KAUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
-
2.MANMOHAN KAUR
-
3.The Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, Office of the Commissioner of Police
-
4.The Sub Divisional Magistrate East, Ludhiana, as the Competent Authority under the Maintenance and
-
5.The Assistant Commissioner of Police
-
6.The Station House Officer, Police Station, Division No
-
7.Rajandeep Singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Kuldeep TiwariView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition after the State confirmed that the Maintenance Tribunal's order dated 21.01.2026 had been fully implemented as of 21.03.2026. Since the underlying cause of action was resolved through compliance, no further court directions were necessary, and the petition was closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Maintenance Tribunal directly for any future grievances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/8254/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition after the State confirmed that the Maintenance Tribunal's order dated 21.01.2026 had been fully implemented as of 21.03.2026. Since the underlying cause of action was resolved through compliance, no further court directions were necessary, and the petition was closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Maintenance Tribunal directly for any future grievances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts