MANMOHAN KAUR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/8254/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

CNR: PHHC010455412026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

18th March 2026

e-Filing Number

15-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/15706/2026

Filing Date

16-03-2026

Registration No

CWP/8254/2026

Registration Date

16-03-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

Coram

MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.72 - MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS/SENIOR CITIZENS ( 764 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227
Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act Section ---

Petitioner(s)

MANMOHAN KAUR

Adv. PARUNJEET SINGH

MANMOHAN KAUR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

MANMOHAN KAUR

The Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana, Office of the Commissioner of Police

The Sub Divisional Magistrate East, Ludhiana, as the Competent Authority under the Maintenance and

The Assistant Commissioner of Police

The Station House Officer, Police Station, Division No

Rajandeep Singh

Orders

24-03-2026
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI

Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition after the State confirmed that the Maintenance Tribunal's order dated 21.01.2026 had been fully implemented as of 21.03.2026. Since the underlying cause of action was resolved through compliance, no further court directions were necessary, and the petition was closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Maintenance Tribunal directly for any future grievances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition after the State confirmed that the Maintenance Tribunal's order dated 21.01.2026 had been fully implemented as of 21.03.2026. Since the underlying cause of action was resolved through compliance, no further court directions were necessary, and the petition was closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Maintenance Tribunal directly for any future grievances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case