LOVEPREET SINGH ALIAS LADDI vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/3057/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010455272026

e-Filing Number

16-03-2026

Filing Number

CRWP/19489/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRWP/3057/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

42.3 - PAROLE ( 312 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LOVEPREET SINGH ALIAS LADDI

    Adv. RAJVINDER KAUR SOHAL

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE PRISIONS

  4. 4.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANSA

  5. 5.SSP MANSA

  6. 6.DIST JAIL MANSA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    Summary of CRWP/3057/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed Lovepreet Singh's petition challenging the rejection of his parole application. Singh, serving a 10-year sentence under the NDPS Act and having served 3+ years, sought 8-week temporary release to repair his dilapidated house and care for elderly parents. The court found the authorities' rejection arbitrary, based on an unsubstantiated police report merely claiming he might sell drugs without any concrete evidence. Applying established precedent that mere apprehension of criminal conduct cannot justify parole denial, the court set aside the rejection orders and granted 8-week parole subject to furnishing surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/3057/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRWP/3057/2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed Lovepreet Singh's petition challenging the rejection of his parole application. Singh, serving a 10-year sentence under the NDPS Act and having served 3+ years, sought 8-week temporary release to repair his dilapidated house and care for elderly parents. The court found the authorities' rejection arbitrary, based on an unsubstantiated police report merely claiming he might sell drugs without any concrete evidence. Applying established precedent that mere apprehension of criminal conduct cannot justify parole denial, the court set aside the rejection orders and granted 8-week parole subject to furnishing surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case