MANEET MALHOTRA vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/15698/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010454952026

Filing Number

CRM-M/19461/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/15698/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

38.1 - QUASHING PETITIONS I/O ( 152 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANEET MALHOTRA

    Adv. CHANDRA KUMAR JHA

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    Summary: CRM-M-15698-2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed the proclamation order dated 28.05.2025 declaring petitioner Maneet Malhotra a proclaimed person, finding that mandatory procedural requirements under Section 82 Cr.P.C. (Section 84 BNSS) for publishing the proclamation were not complied with—specifically, the three modes of publication (public reading, affixing at accused's residence, and affixing at court-house) must be cumulatively satisfied and duly proved. The Court allowed the petition and directed the petitioner to appear before the trial court within four weeks, granting bail upon furnishing bonds and undertaking to appear regularly at trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/15698/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: CRM-M-15698-2026 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana quashed the proclamation order dated 28.05.2025 declaring petitioner Maneet Malhotra a proclaimed person, finding that mandatory procedural requirements under Section 82 Cr.P.C. (Section 84 BNSS) for publishing the proclamation were not complied with—specifically, the three modes of publication (public reading, affixing at accused's residence, and affixing at court-house) must be cumulatively satisfied and duly proved. The Court allowed the petition and directed the petitioner to appear before the trial court within four weeks, granting bail upon furnishing bonds and undertaking to appear regularly at trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case