RAM SINGH AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHER Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CWP/9288/2019

Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Apr-2019

CNR: PHHC010453672019

Filing Number

CWP/23979/2019

Filing Date

04-Apr-2019

Registration No

CWP/9288/2019

Registration Date

05-Apr-2019

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.12 - MISC. PUNJAB ( 738 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM SINGH AND ANOTHER

    Adv. S S GREWAL

  2. 2.BALDEV SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHER Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB

  2. 2.CHAIRMAN, NRI COMMISSION PUNJAB

  3. 3.DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE(HQ)

  4. 4.SHO (Station House Officer) POLICE STATION NRI,

  5. 5.KULWINDER KAUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    The Punjab High Court disposed of the petition challenging the NRI Commission's March 2019 order recommending FIR registration against the petitioners (father-in-law and brother-in-law) under Section 498-A IPC. The court held that while the Commission can make recommendations, it lacks authority to direct police to register FIRs; police must independently examine evidence and proceed lawfully. The court trusted that police would act in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2019

    Other

  4. 04-Apr-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/9288/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab High Court disposed of the petition challenging the NRI Commission's March 2019 order recommending FIR registration against the petitioners (father-in-law and brother-in-law) under Section 498-A IPC. The court held that while the Commission can make recommendations, it lacks authority to direct police to register FIRs; police must independently examine evidence and proceed lawfully. The court trusted that police would act in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case