JD SANDHU J D SANDHU vs THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS — RA-CW/138/2026
Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010451452026
e-Filing Number
16-03-2026
Filing Number
RA-CW/15550/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
RA-CW/138/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Vikas Suri
Coram
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi , Mr. Justice Vikas Suri
Category
0 ( 944 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JD SANDHU J D SANDHU
-
2.JD SANDHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Mr. Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi,mr. Justice Vikas SuriView PDF
Case Summary: RA-CW/138/2026 Court Decision (15.05.2026): The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed J.D. Sandhu's review application, holding that he merely attempted to re-argue the case rather than demonstrate any factual error justifying review. The court condoned his 160-day delay in filing but found no grounds for interference, as review jurisdiction cannot be used to challenge decisions on merits—that remedy belongs to appellate courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. RA-CW/138/2026
Case Summary: RA-CW/138/2026 Court Decision (15.05.2026): The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed J.D. Sandhu's review application, holding that he merely attempted to re-argue the case rather than demonstrate any factual error justifying review. The court condoned his 160-day delay in filing but found no grounds for interference, as review jurisdiction cannot be used to challenge decisions on merits—that remedy belongs to appellate courts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts