THAMBU RAM vs ZILE SINGH — RSA/4534/2000

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 03-Jan-2005

CNR: PHHC010450562000

Filing Number

RSA/4534/2000

Filing Date

13-Dec-2000

Registration No

RSA/4534/2000

Registration Date

13-Dec-2000

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

26 - RSA ( 496 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THAMBU RAM

    Adv. RAJBIR SEHRAWAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ZILE SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: RSA/4534/2000 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal filed by Thambu Ram and others against Zile Singh in default for want of prosecution. The appellants' counsel had previously requested time to contact clients regarding their interest in pursuing the appeal, but no representation appeared on the hearing date, indicating the appellants' lack of interest in continuing proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Dec-2005

    Mr. Justice Surinder Singh Grewal

  4. 29-Aug-2005

    Mr. Justice Surinder Singh Grewal

  5. 07-Jul-2005

    Mr. Justice Surinder Singh Grewal

  6. 14-Feb-2005

    Mr. Justice Surinder Singh Grewal

  7. 03-Jan-2005

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 13-Dec-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/4534/2000

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RSA/4534/2000 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal filed by Thambu Ram and others against Zile Singh in default for want of prosecution. The appellants' counsel had previously requested time to contact clients regarding their interest in pursuing the appeal, but no representation appeared on the hearing date, indicating the appellants' lack of interest in continuing proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case