SANJAY vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/15091/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010447422026

Filing Number

CRM-M/19066/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/15091/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY

    Adv. ANIL CHAWLA

  2. 2.SANJAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.SANJAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/15091/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Sanjay, who was arrested in November 2025 for alleged fraud, forgery, and criminal intimidation in a disputed shop sale transaction. The court found that after 4 months and 29 days of incarceration, no tangible evidence demonstrated risk of absconding or witness tampering, and with 15 prosecution witnesses still unexamined, trial completion would take considerable time. Applying constitutional principles favoring bail absent extraordinary circumstances, the court released him on surety bonds with conditions including non-tampering with evidence, regular court attendance, and surrendering his passport. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/15091/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/15091/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Sanjay, who was arrested in November 2025 for alleged fraud, forgery, and criminal intimidation in a disputed shop sale transaction. The court found that after 4 months and 29 days of incarceration, no tangible evidence demonstrated risk of absconding or witness tampering, and with 15 prosecution witnesses still unexamined, trial completion would take considerable time. Applying constitutional principles favoring bail absent extraordinary circumstances, the court released him on surety bonds with conditions including non-tampering with evidence, regular court attendance, and surrendering his passport. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case