SAROOP SINGH AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/8366/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010446432026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/15422/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/8366/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Namit Kumar

Bench Type

Single

Category

68.4 - SERVICE EDU-PUNJAB(PRIMARY) ( 793 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAROOP SINGH AND ANOTHER

    Adv. SANDEEP ARORA

  2. 2.State of Punjab and others

  3. 3.Amanpreet Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Punjab and others

  3. 3.Amanpreet Singh

  4. 4.District Education Officer Elementary Education Gurdas

  5. 5.Didar Singh

  6. 6.Harkomal Singh son of Joginder SingH

  7. 7.Navdeep wife of Ashok Kumar, resident of

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Namit KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP-8366/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition of two ETT teachers whose services were terminated in 2003 based on forged degree certificates from Magadh University. Justice Namit Kumar held that the petitioners failed to provide documentary evidence of degree genuineness despite being granted liberty in earlier proceedings to do so, and could not be permitted to re-agitate the matter after once failing on merits and due to delay and laches spanning over two decades. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8366/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP-8366/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the petition of two ETT teachers whose services were terminated in 2003 based on forged degree certificates from Magadh University. Justice Namit Kumar held that the petitioners failed to provide documentary evidence of degree genuineness despite being granted liberty in earlier proceedings to do so, and could not be permitted to re-agitate the matter after once failing on merits and due to delay and laches spanning over two decades. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case