PRITAM SINGH vs BHUPINDER SINGH @ BHANI AND ORS — CRM-A/490/2022

Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010444252022

Filing Number

CRM-A/26634/2022

Filing Date

27-Apr-2022

Registration No

CRM-A/490/2022

Registration Date

30-Jun-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

36.1 - LEAVE TO APPEAL ( 241 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRITAM SINGH

    Adv. PANKAJ BALI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHUPINDER SINGH @ BHANI AND ORS

  2. 2.JAI SINGH

  3. 3.RAM KUMAR

  4. 4.KASHMIR SINGH

  5. 5.KRISHAN KUMAR

  6. 6.RAMESH KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    Summary of CRM-A/490/2022 Pritam Singh's appeal challenging the acquittal of respondents in a 2010 complaint case was remitted to the Sessions Judge, Ambala for reconsideration. The court, applying Supreme Court precedent in M/s Celestium Financial, directed the appeal be treated as filed under Section 372 CrPC (victim's appeal right) rather than Section 378(4) CrPC (complainant's appeal requiring special leave), determining that if Singh qualifies as a victim, he can appeal as of right without needing special leave. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-A/490/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRM-A/490/2022 Pritam Singh's appeal challenging the acquittal of respondents in a 2010 complaint case was remitted to the Sessions Judge, Ambala for reconsideration. The court, applying Supreme Court precedent in M/s Celestium Financial, directed the appeal be treated as filed under Section 372 CrPC (victim's appeal right) rather than Section 378(4) CrPC (complainant's appeal requiring special leave), determining that if Singh qualifies as a victim, he can appeal as of right without needing special leave. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case