KAJAL SHARMA vs SHUBHAM SHARMA — TA/384/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 21-Mar-2025

CNR: PHHC010443882025

e-Filing Number

18-03-2025

Filing Number

TA/17042/2025

Filing Date

18-Mar-2025

Registration No

TA/384/2025

Registration Date

19-Mar-2025

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

35 - TRANSFERS ( 565 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAJAL SHARMA

    Adv. Atul Gaur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHUBHAM SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: TA/384/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Kajal Sharma's petition seeking transfer of her husband Shubham Sharma's matrimonial proceedings from Ludhiana Family Court to Panchkula. Although the wife cited distance (145 km) and lack of direct transportation as hardships, the court found insufficient extenuating circumstances warranted transfer. The respondent undertook to reimburse ₹2,000 travel expenses per hearing date, mitigating the petitioner's financial burden for attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. TA/384/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TA/384/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Kajal Sharma's petition seeking transfer of her husband Shubham Sharma's matrimonial proceedings from Ludhiana Family Court to Panchkula. Although the wife cited distance (145 km) and lack of direct transportation as hardships, the court found insufficient extenuating circumstances warranted transfer. The respondent undertook to reimburse ₹2,000 travel expenses per hearing date, mitigating the petitioner's financial burden for attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case