TASLIM @ TASLEEM vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/15234/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010441852026

Filing Number

CRM-M/18787/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/15234/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Coram

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Bench Type

Single

Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TASLIM @ TASLEEM

    Adv. GOPAL SHARMA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Ms. Justice Mandeep PannuView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to petitioner Taslim @ Tasleem in a cyber fraud case involving fake SIM cards and illegal bank transactions. The court found that the petitioner had been in custody for over one year, the challan was already presented with charges framed, no prosecution witnesses had been examined, and co-accused persons including the main accused had already been granted bail, placing the petitioner on parity with them. The court ruled that further incarceration would serve no useful purpose and ordered his release on regular bail subject to furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/15234/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to petitioner Taslim @ Tasleem in a cyber fraud case involving fake SIM cards and illegal bank transactions. The court found that the petitioner had been in custody for over one year, the challan was already presented with charges framed, no prosecution witnesses had been examined, and co-accused persons including the main accused had already been granted bail, placing the petitioner on parity with them. The court ruled that further incarceration would serve no useful purpose and ordered his release on regular bail subject to furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case