KULBHUSHAN YADAV vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/8457/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 19-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010440562026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/15169/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/8457/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Coram

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.12 - SERVICE-EDU-HARYANA(SR.EDU DEPT)RETIRAL BENEFITS ( 707 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KULBHUSHAN YADAV

    Adv. P.L. VERMA

  2. 2.The State of Haryana and others

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.The State of Haryana and others

  3. 3.The School EducationDepartment Haryana

  4. 4.The District Education Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Tribhuvan DahiyaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/8457/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Kulbhushan Yadav's petition seeking immediate release of full pension and retiral benefits. The court found that disciplinary proceedings under Rule 7 of the Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 2016 remain pending against the petitioner (a Block Education Officer), and therefore only provisional pension is admissible until the proceedings conclude. The court disposed the petition with liberty for the petitioner to file a representation within two weeks for provisional pension release, which must be decided within two months, with ₹50,000 costs if the deadline is missed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8457/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/8457/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Kulbhushan Yadav's petition seeking immediate release of full pension and retiral benefits. The court found that disciplinary proceedings under Rule 7 of the Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 2016 remain pending against the petitioner (a Block Education Officer), and therefore only provisional pension is admissible until the proceedings conclude. The court disposed the petition with liberty for the petitioner to file a representation within two weeks for provisional pension release, which must be decided within two months, with ₹50,000 costs if the deadline is missed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case