SATISH KUMAR AND ORS vs UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD AND ORS — CWP/8897/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 29-Apr-2022

CNR: PHHC010438552022

Filing Number

CWP/17561/2022

Filing Date

26-Apr-2022

Registration No

CWP/8897/2022

Registration Date

27-Apr-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Coram

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Bench Type

Single

Category

20.11 - SCOSB (HARYANA) ( 453 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATISH KUMAR AND ORS

    Adv. MOHNISH SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF

    SUMMARY The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of multiple connected petitions filed by Lineman employees of Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd challenging unilateral salary reductions. The court found that the respondent-Nigam reduced the petitioners' basic pay from Rs. 38,400 to Rs. 37,300 after more than five years without issuing any show cause notice or affording them a hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The court directed the respondent-Nigam to treat the petitions as representations and reconsider the petitioners' claims by passing a reasoned order after providing them an opportunity of hearing within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2022

    Other

  4. 26-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8897/2022

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of multiple connected petitions filed by Lineman employees of Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd challenging unilateral salary reductions. The court found that the respondent-Nigam reduced the petitioners' basic pay from Rs. 38,400 to Rs. 37,300 after more than five years without issuing any show cause notice or affording them a hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The court directed the respondent-Nigam to treat the petitions as representations and reconsider the petitioners' claims by passing a reasoned order after providing them an opportunity of hearing within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case