MAN MOHAN SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/16140/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010434612026

Filing Number

CRM-M/18426/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/16140/2026

Registration Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAN MOHAN SINGH

    Adv. ARUN SHARMA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to Man Mohan Singh in a fraud case (FIR No. 278/2025) involving forged documents. The court found that Singh had been in custody for over 5 months, investigation was complete, charges were framed, but no prosecution witnesses had been examined, making lengthy trial proceedings inevitable. The court reasoned that prolonged detention without imminent trial conclusion violates Article 21 rights and contradicts the principle "bail is a rule, jail is an exception," rejecting the State's argument that other criminal cases against Singh justified continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/16140/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to Man Mohan Singh in a fraud case (FIR No. 278/2025) involving forged documents. The court found that Singh had been in custody for over 5 months, investigation was complete, charges were framed, but no prosecution witnesses had been examined, making lengthy trial proceedings inevitable. The court reasoned that prolonged detention without imminent trial conclusion violates Article 21 rights and contradicts the principle "bail is a rule, jail is an exception," rejecting the State's argument that other criminal cases against Singh justified continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case