LOVE KAMAL vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CWP/9080/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-May-2022

CNR: PHHC010434222022

Filing Number

CWP/17380/2022

Filing Date

26-Apr-2022

Registration No

CWP/9080/2022

Registration Date

29-Apr-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Coram

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Bench Type

Single

Category

68.26 - SERVICE-ENGINEERING-PUNJAB(PWD,B&R&PUBLIC HEALTH ( 782 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LOVE KAMAL

    Adv. R.K.ARYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB

  2. 2.CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION, HEAD OFFICE,

  3. 3.SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER ,WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION CIRCLE

  4. 4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION DIVISION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Kuldeep TiwariView PDF

    CWP-9080-2022 Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Love Kamal's petition seeking regularization of his services with the Water Supply and Sanitation Department. The court found that Kamal was an enlisted Class-III contractor, not a regular employee, as evidenced by his contractor enlistment certificate renewed in 2020. Since the department had no requirement for data entry maintenance work in 2021-2022 (having assigned such work to newly appointed employees instead), Kamal's services could not be regularized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2022

    Other

  4. 26-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/9080/2022

casestatus.in Summary

CWP-9080-2022 Summary The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Love Kamal's petition seeking regularization of his services with the Water Supply and Sanitation Department. The court found that Kamal was an enlisted Class-III contractor, not a regular employee, as evidenced by his contractor enlistment certificate renewed in 2020. Since the department had no requirement for data entry maintenance work in 2021-2022 (having assigned such work to newly appointed employees instead), Kamal's services could not be regularized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case