AARIF vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/14627/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

CNR: PHHC010431682026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CRM-M/18316/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/14627/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Coram

MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

21st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Petitioner(s)

AARIF

Adv. ANAS AHMED

AARIF

Respondent(s)

STATE OF HARYANA

AARIF

Orders

21-04-2026
MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL

Case Summary: CRM-M/14627/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Aarif, who had been in custody for approximately 8 months and 29 days on charges including attempted murder, kidnapping, and criminal intimidation (FIR No.252, July 2025). Justice Sumeet Goel found that while only 5 of 20 prosecution witnesses had been examined and the trial was in early stages, there was no evidence suggesting the petitioner would abscond or tamper with evidence. The court held that prior criminal antecedents alone cannot bar bail when circumstances of the specific FIR warrant release. Bail was granted subject to standard conditions including appearance at trial, no tampering with evidence, and deposit of passport. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/14627/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Aarif, who had been in custody for approximately 8 months and 29 days on charges including attempted murder, kidnapping, and criminal intimidation (FIR No.252, July 2025). Justice Sumeet Goel found that while only 5 of 20 prosecution witnesses had been examined and the trial was in early stages, there was no evidence suggesting the petitioner would abscond or tamper with evidence. The court held that prior criminal antecedents alone cannot bar bail when circumstances of the specific FIR warrant release. Bail was granted subject to standard conditions including appearance at trial, no tampering with evidence, and deposit of passport. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case