VIVEK YADAV vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/14630/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
CNR: PHHC010430312026
Filing Number
CRM-M/18153/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/14630/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh
Coram
Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIVEK YADAV
Adv. BALVINDER SANGWAN
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF
Case Summary: CRM-M-14630-2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to petitioner Vivek Yadav in a criminal case involving charges under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The petitioner was accused of participating in a fatal fight that resulted in the death of a young man named Ayush. Key Reasoning: Justice Surya Partap Singh emphasized that bail is the general rule, not the exception, and considered that the petitioner had been in custody for over 14 months, had no criminal history, was not carrying a weapon during the incident, bore no direct responsibility for the fatal injury, and faced a trial unlikely to conclude soon. The court applied constitutional principles protecting the right to speedy trial under Article 21. Conditions: Bail was granted on personal and surety bonds with conditions that the petitioner not tamper with evidence, maintain contact with the court, and refrain from leaving India without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/14630/2026
Case Summary: CRM-M-14630-2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted bail to petitioner Vivek Yadav in a criminal case involving charges under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The petitioner was accused of participating in a fatal fight that resulted in the death of a young man named Ayush. Key Reasoning: Justice Surya Partap Singh emphasized that bail is the general rule, not the exception, and considered that the petitioner had been in custody for over 14 months, had no criminal history, was not carrying a weapon during the incident, bore no direct responsibility for the fatal injury, and faced a trial unlikely to conclude soon. The court applied constitutional principles protecting the right to speedy trial under Article 21. Conditions: Bail was granted on personal and surety bonds with conditions that the petitioner not tamper with evidence, maintain contact with the court, and refrain from leaving India without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts