RAJIV vs UNION OF INDIA — CWP/7893/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.
CNR: PHHC010429152026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
CWP/14757/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
CWP/7893/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal
Coram
Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal
Bench Type
Single
Category
63.15 - MISC. UOI ( 741 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 11-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJIV
Adv. SHREY GOEL
-
2.Rajiv
-
3.Pooja
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA
-
2.Rajiv
-
3.Pooja
-
4.State of UT
-
5.Senior Superintendent of Police
-
6.Punjab Sind Bank
-
7.State Bank of India
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF
The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed banks to de-freeze the petitioners' accounts within 7 days, finding no FIR, no Magistrate's attachment order under BNSS Section 107, and no prima facie nexus between the petitioners and alleged offences. The disputed amounts (Rs. 26,000 and Rs. 6,644) remain frozen, but petitioners can operate remaining account balances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/7893/2026
The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed banks to de-freeze the petitioners' accounts within 7 days, finding no FIR, no Magistrate's attachment order under BNSS Section 107, and no prima facie nexus between the petitioners and alleged offences. The disputed amounts (Rs. 26,000 and Rs. 6,644) remain frozen, but petitioners can operate remaining account balances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts