RAJESH KUMAR vs RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS — CWP/8299/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Mar-2026

CNR: PHHC010428722026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/14736/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/8299/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.15 - MISC. UOI ( 741 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH KUMAR

    Adv. RENU BALA KAMBOJ

  2. 2.RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS

  3. 3.CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA

  4. 4.CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana ordered the Central Bank of India to de-freeze petitioner Rajesh Kumar's bank account within one week, finding that the account freeze lacked legal justification as no FIR was registered against him and no Magistrate's order under Section 107 of BNSS was issued. The petitioner remains barred from utilizing the disputed amount of Rs. 3,233/-, which shall remain frozen, and the court clarified the order does not protect the petitioner if he is later found involved in any criminal offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8299/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana ordered the Central Bank of India to de-freeze petitioner Rajesh Kumar's bank account within one week, finding that the account freeze lacked legal justification as no FIR was registered against him and no Magistrate's order under Section 107 of BNSS was issued. The petitioner remains barred from utilizing the disputed amount of Rs. 3,233/-, which shall remain frozen, and the court clarified the order does not protect the petitioner if he is later found involved in any criminal offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case