VIJAY KUMAR vs HDFC BANK AND ANR — CWP/7901/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010427732026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

CWP/14669/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWP/7901/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Coram

Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal

Bench Type

Single

Category

63.15 - MISC. UOI ( 741 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY KUMAR

    Adv. CHANDAN SINGH

  2. 2.Vijay Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HDFC BANK AND ANR

  2. 2.Vijay Kumar

  3. 3.INVESTIGATION OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Jagmohan BansalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed HDFC Bank to de-freeze Vijay Kumar's account within 7 days, finding that the account was illegally frozen without an FIR or magistrate's attachment order under Section 107 BNSS, despite the petitioner not being named as an accused in Crime No.12/2025. The court held the mechanical account freeze without proper legal authorization was unjustified, though clarified this relief does not shield the petitioner from future prosecution if criminal involvement is established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/7901/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana directed HDFC Bank to de-freeze Vijay Kumar's account within 7 days, finding that the account was illegally frozen without an FIR or magistrate's attachment order under Section 107 BNSS, despite the petitioner not being named as an accused in Crime No.12/2025. The court held the mechanical account freeze without proper legal authorization was unjustified, though clarified this relief does not shield the petitioner from future prosecution if criminal involvement is established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case