SANDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/14472/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010426302026

Filing Number

CRM-M/17951/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/14472/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Coram

Ms. Justice Rupinderjit Chahal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANDEEP SINGH

    Adv. Sumeet Puri

  2. 2.SANDEEP SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.SANDEEP SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Rupinderjit ChahalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/14472/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Sandeep Singh in a mobile snatching case. The court held that after 4+ months in custody with investigation complete and charges not yet framed, continued detention violated Article 21 rights. While injuries were attributed to the petitioner, only two were declared simple in nature, and a co-accused received similar bail. The court rejected the state's reliance on prior criminal cases, holding bail decisions must focus on present case circumstances, not past antecedents alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/14472/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/14472/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Sandeep Singh in a mobile snatching case. The court held that after 4+ months in custody with investigation complete and charges not yet framed, continued detention violated Article 21 rights. While injuries were attributed to the petitioner, only two were declared simple in nature, and a co-accused received similar bail. The court rejected the state's reliance on prior criminal cases, holding bail decisions must focus on present case circumstances, not past antecedents alone. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case