NAWABUDDIN vs KUMEDDIN — RSA/2343/2000

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010426242000

Filing Number

RSA/2343/2000

Filing Date

13-Jun-2000

Registration No

RSA/2343/2000

Registration Date

13-Jun-2000

Judge

Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Coram

Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Bench Type

Single

Category

77.5 - EXECUTION PETITION (COMMERCIAL) ( 253 )

Sub-Category

( 253 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAWABUDDIN

    Adv. RAJIV SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KUMEDDIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Parmod GoyalView PDF

    Case Summary: RSA 2343/2000 (Nawabuddin v. Kumeddin) The High Court of Punjab & Haryana upheld the lower courts' decision that a 1969 Collector's order declaring land as surplus was void ab initio, as it violated the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 by wrongfully including Banjar Kadim and Gair Mumkin land (uncultivable/waste land) in the surplus calculation and imposing a penalty without proper notice. However, the court modified the relief by remitting the matter to authorities for fresh determination of surplus land in compliance with statutory provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Jun-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/2343/2000

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RSA 2343/2000 (Nawabuddin v. Kumeddin) The High Court of Punjab & Haryana upheld the lower courts' decision that a 1969 Collector's order declaring land as surplus was void ab initio, as it violated the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 by wrongfully including Banjar Kadim and Gair Mumkin land (uncultivable/waste land) in the surplus calculation and imposing a penalty without proper notice. However, the court modified the relief by remitting the matter to authorities for fresh determination of surplus land in compliance with statutory provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case