GURPREET SINGH @ GOPY SINGH @ GOPY vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/14174/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010423762026

Filing Number

CRM-M/17804/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/14174/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Coram

Mr. Justice Sumeet Goel

Bench Type

Single

Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURPREET SINGH @ GOPY SINGH @ GOPY

    Adv. GURVIR KAUR

  2. 2.GURPREET SINGH @ GOPY SINGH @ GOPY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.GURPREET SINGH @ GOPY SINGH @ GOPY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Sumeet GoelView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted absolute anticipatory bail to Gurpreet Singh in an NDPS drug case (FIR No. 332), converting an interim order from March 16, 2026. The court found that since the petitioner had joined the investigation voluntarily, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and being implicated solely on a co-accused's disclosure statement warranted bail protection. The order is limited to this specific FIR and subject to standard bail conditions under Section 482(2) of BNSS, with liberty reserved for the state to seek cancellation if conditions are violated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/14174/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted absolute anticipatory bail to Gurpreet Singh in an NDPS drug case (FIR No. 332), converting an interim order from March 16, 2026. The court found that since the petitioner had joined the investigation voluntarily, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and being implicated solely on a co-accused's disclosure statement warranted bail protection. The order is limited to this specific FIR and subject to standard bail conditions under Section 482(2) of BNSS, with liberty reserved for the state to seek cancellation if conditions are violated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case