SUNIL SAHARAN @ SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/13702/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010421312026

Filing Number

CRM-M/17708/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/13702/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat

Coram

Mr. Justice N.S. Shekhawat

Bench Type

Single

Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL SAHARAN @ SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS

    Adv. MAYANK

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.PARDEEP KUMAR

  4. 4.PAWANVEER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice N.S. ShekhawatView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail relief to petitioners Sunil Saharan (Petitioner No.1) by permitting surrender before the Area Magistrate within 10 days with expedited bail consideration within 5 days. For petitioners No.2 and 3, the court made absolute its interim order from 25.03.2026, requiring them to join investigation as called by the Investigating Officer while abiding by Section 482(2) BNSS conditions. The petitioners challenged the FIR registered for alleged violence and false allegations, claiming they were targeted for reporting illegal mining activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/13702/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail relief to petitioners Sunil Saharan (Petitioner No.1) by permitting surrender before the Area Magistrate within 10 days with expedited bail consideration within 5 days. For petitioners No.2 and 3, the court made absolute its interim order from 25.03.2026, requiring them to join investigation as called by the Investigating Officer while abiding by Section 482(2) BNSS conditions. The petitioners challenged the FIR registered for alleged violence and false allegations, claiming they were targeted for reporting illegal mining activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case