JASVINDER SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/29332/2018
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010420372018
Next Hearing
16th July 2018
Filing Number
CRM-M/29332/2018
Filing Date
12-07-2018
Registration No
CRM-M/29332/2018
Registration Date
12-07-2018
Judge
MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
Coram
MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
Bench Type
Single
Category
38.3 - PROCEEDING STAYED IN QUASHING ( 197 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JASVINDER SINGH
Adv. G.C. SHAHPURI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF HARYANA
Hearing History
Judge: MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-07-2018 | |
| 15-10-2018 |
Orders
MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Jasvinder Singh's petition challenging his summons as an additional accused under Section 319 CrPC in a 2013 assault case. The court upheld the trial court's summoning order, finding that although Singh was initially cleared during investigation, witness testimony during trial specifically attributed brick-bat injuries to him, providing sufficient prima-facie evidence for his prosecution. The court held that alibi pleas and investigative findings cannot preclude summoning under Section 319 CrPC if trial evidence emerges against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Jasvinder Singh's petition challenging his summons as an additional accused under Section 319 CrPC in a 2013 assault case. The court upheld the trial court's summoning order, finding that although Singh was initially cleared during investigation, witness testimony during trial specifically attributed brick-bat injuries to him, providing sufficient prima-facie evidence for his prosecution. The court held that alibi pleas and investigative findings cannot preclude summoning under Section 319 CrPC if trial evidence emerges against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts