JASVINDER SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/29332/2018

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Jul-2018

CNR: PHHC010420372018

Filing Number

CRM-M/29332/2018

Filing Date

12-Jul-2018

Registration No

CRM-M/29332/2018

Registration Date

12-Jul-2018

Judge

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Coram

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.3 - PROCEEDING STAYED IN QUASHING ( 197 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JASVINDER SINGH

    Adv. G.C. SHAHPURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Mandeep PannuView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Jasvinder Singh's petition challenging his summons as an additional accused under Section 319 CrPC in a 2013 assault case. The court upheld the trial court's summoning order, finding that although Singh was initially cleared during investigation, witness testimony during trial specifically attributed brick-bat injuries to him, providing sufficient prima-facie evidence for his prosecution. The court held that alibi pleas and investigative findings cannot preclude summoning under Section 319 CrPC if trial evidence emerges against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Oct-2018

    Mr. Justice Ramendra Jain

  4. 15-Oct-2018

    —

    Lok Adalat Bench - 1

  5. 16-Jul-2018

    Mr. Justice Ramendra Jain

  6. 16-Jul-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Jul-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/29332/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Jasvinder Singh's petition challenging his summons as an additional accused under Section 319 CrPC in a 2013 assault case. The court upheld the trial court's summoning order, finding that although Singh was initially cleared during investigation, witness testimony during trial specifically attributed brick-bat injuries to him, providing sufficient prima-facie evidence for his prosecution. The court held that alibi pleas and investigative findings cannot preclude summoning under Section 319 CrPC if trial evidence emerges against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case