AHSAAN RANA vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/14580/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010418142026

Filing Number

CRM-M/17532/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/14580/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AHSAAN RANA

    Adv. SARFRAJ HUSSAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M/14580/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Ahsaan Rana, accused of attempt to murder (IPC §307) and Arms Act violations in connection with a shooting incident on July 4-5, 2022. The Court found that Rana's implication relied primarily on a co-accused's disclosure statement (which is inadmissible evidence), that the actual shooter was identified as Vivek Yadav (already granted anticipatory bail), and that Rana had already served 4 months 20 days in custody with no prosecution witnesses examined out of 33. Accordingly, bail was granted subject to furnishing bonds within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/14580/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M/14580/2026 The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to Ahsaan Rana, accused of attempt to murder (IPC §307) and Arms Act violations in connection with a shooting incident on July 4-5, 2022. The Court found that Rana's implication relied primarily on a co-accused's disclosure statement (which is inadmissible evidence), that the actual shooter was identified as Vivek Yadav (already granted anticipatory bail), and that Rana had already served 4 months 20 days in custody with no prosecution witnesses examined out of 33. Accordingly, bail was granted subject to furnishing bonds within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case