SARMUKH SINGH PRITAM SINGH BAATH vs CHAJJA SINGH — RSA/1559/2000

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Jan-2013

CNR: PHHC010417532000

Filing Number

RSA/1559/2000

Filing Date

08-Apr-2000

Registration No

RSA/1559/2000

Registration Date

08-Apr-2000

Judge

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Coram

Mr. Justice Virinder Aggarwal

Bench Type

Single

Category

26 - RSA ( 496 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARMUKH SINGH PRITAM SINGH BAATH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHAJJA SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Virinder AggarwalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. The appellant failed to appear on multiple hearing dates, and notice could not be served as the appellant had left his address while the respondent had died. Consequently, all pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of as no useful purpose would be served in keeping the case pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Feb-2013

    Mr. Justice G.C. Garg (Retd.)

  4. 20-Feb-2013

    Mr. Justice Gurmit Ram

  5. 07-Feb-2013

    Mr. Justice G.C. Garg (Retd.)

  6. 07-Feb-2013

    Mr. Justice Gurmit Ram

  7. 17-Jan-2013

    Mr. Justice G.C. Garg (Retd.)

  8. 17-Jan-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 08-Apr-2000

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/1559/2000

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. The appellant failed to appear on multiple hearing dates, and notice could not be served as the appellant had left his address while the respondent had died. Consequently, all pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of as no useful purpose would be served in keeping the case pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case