KCC BUILDCON PVT LTD vs HARYANA SHAHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS — ARB/185/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 11. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Mar-2025

CNR: PHHC010416562025

e-Filing Number

11-03-2025

Filing Number

ARB/15907/2025

Filing Date

12-Mar-2025

Registration No

ARB/185/2025

Registration Date

18-Mar-2025

Judge

The Chief Justice

Coram

The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single

Category

69.3 - ARBITRATION U/S 11 (5 CRORE AND ABOVE) ( 937 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KCC BUILDCON PVT LTD

    Adv. GAURAV ARORA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARYANA SHAHARI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana appointed Mr. Justice Vineet Kothari, former Acting Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court, as sole arbitrator to resolve the dispute between KCC Buildcon Pvt Ltd and Haryana Shahari Vikas Pradhikaran. The court found that the parties had a valid arbitration agreement (Clause 25(A) of their contract), the applicant exhausted pre-arbitration remedies including the 60-day Executive Engineer decision period, and the disputes were manifestly arbitrable, rejecting the respondent's limitation objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. ARB/185/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana appointed Mr. Justice Vineet Kothari, former Acting Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court, as sole arbitrator to resolve the dispute between KCC Buildcon Pvt Ltd and Haryana Shahari Vikas Pradhikaran. The court found that the parties had a valid arbitration agreement (Clause 25(A) of their contract), the applicant exhausted pre-arbitration remedies including the 60-day Executive Engineer decision period, and the disputes were manifestly arbitrable, rejecting the respondent's limitation objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case