STATE OF HY. AG.HY. vs SHYAME ETC. — RSA/1448/2000

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 10-Feb-2005

CNR: PHHC010416302000

Filing Number

RSA/1448/2000

Filing Date

05-May-5500

Registration No

RSA/1448/2000

Registration Date

05-May-5500

Judge

Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Coram

Mr. Justice Parmod Goyal

Bench Type

Single

Category

26 - RSA ( 496 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HY. AG.HY.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHYAME ETC.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-5500

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/1448/2000

  3. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Parmod GoyalView PDF

    Case Summary: RSA/1448/2000 - State of Haryana v. Shyame The High Court of Punjab & Haryana upheld the lower courts' decision that a 1969 surplus land declaration was void ab initio. The court found the Collector violated the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 by wrongly including non-cultivable land (Banjar Kadim, Banjar Jadi, and Gair Mumkin) in surplus calculations and imposing a penalty without prior notice, breaching natural justice principles. However, the court modified the relief, directing authorities to redetermine surplus land in accordance with law after proper notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 03-May-2005

    —

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Mohunta

  5. 25-Apr-2005

    —

    Mr. Justice Ashutosh Mohunta

  6. 10-Feb-2005

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RSA/1448/2000 - State of Haryana v. Shyame The High Court of Punjab & Haryana upheld the lower courts' decision that a 1969 surplus land declaration was void ab initio. The court found the Collector violated the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953 by wrongly including non-cultivable land (Banjar Kadim, Banjar Jadi, and Gair Mumkin) in surplus calculations and imposing a penalty without prior notice, breaching natural justice principles. However, the court modified the relief, directing authorities to redetermine surplus land in accordance with law after proper notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case