HARI KISHAN SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND ORS. vs JASWANT AND ORS. — RSA/1582/2026
Disposed: --DISMISSED on 15th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010409842026
Filing Number
RSA/13960/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
RSA/1582/2026
Registration Date
23-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor
Coram
Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH
Decision Date
15-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARI KISHAN SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS AND ORS.
Adv. SARUN HANS
-
2.JASWANT SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.JASWANT AND ORS.
-
2.JASWANT SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-May-2026
Mr. Justice Yashvir Singh RathorView PDF
Summary of RSA/1582/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed two appeals by Hari Kishan's legal representatives and Jaswant Singh challenging a partition decree. The court upheld the appellate court's decision affirming that joint lessees have the right to partition leasehold rights, rejecting arguments that such partition is prohibited. The court found defendants unlawfully occupied 59 excess square yards beyond their entitled 332 square yards of the disputed agricultural land (Khasra No.758), as defendants failed to provide credible evidence justifying the excess possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. RSA/1582/2026
Summary of RSA/1582/2026 The Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed two appeals by Hari Kishan's legal representatives and Jaswant Singh challenging a partition decree. The court upheld the appellate court's decision affirming that joint lessees have the right to partition leasehold rights, rejecting arguments that such partition is prohibited. The court found defendants unlawfully occupied 59 excess square yards beyond their entitled 332 square yards of the disputed agricultural land (Khasra No.758), as defendants failed to provide credible evidence justifying the excess possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts